翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Homer Township ・ Homer Township, Bates County, Missouri ・ Homer Township, Benton County, Iowa ・ Homer Township, Buchanan County, Iowa ・ Homer Township, Calhoun County, Michigan ・ Homer Township, Medina County, Ohio ・ Homer Township, Michigan ・ Homer Township, Midland County, Michigan ・ Homer Township, Morgan County, Ohio ・ Homer Township, Ohio ・ Homer Township, Potter County, Pennsylvania ・ Homer Township, Will County, Illinois ・ Homer Township, Winona County, Minnesota ・ Homer Tribune ・ Homer Tunnel ・ Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire ・ Homer V. M. Miller ・ Homer Van Meter ・ Homer Vawter ・ Homer vs. Dignity ・ Homer vs. Lisa and the 8th Commandment ・ Homer vs. Patty and Selma ・ Homer vs. the Eighteenth Amendment ・ Homer W. Hall ・ Homer Watson ・ Homer Wilson Ranch ・ Homer Woodson Hargiss ・ Homer Wright rosette ・ Homer's Barbershop Quartet ・ Homer's Daughter Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire ： ウィキペディア英語版 Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire ''Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police'' () (UKSC 15 ) is a UK labour law case, concerning the discrimination under what is now the Equality Act 2010. ==Facts== Mr Homer claimed indirect age discrimination, because after a rule change he was required to have a law degreee to get onto the third and highest pay grade, once he was 62 years old. He began working as a legal adviser in 1995 with the Police National Legal Database. He was required to have a law degree or in his case ‘exceptional experience in criminal law with a lesser qualification’. But to get the highest pay grade after a 2005 review, legal advisers now actually had to have a law degree, and so he was refused entry. He brought a claim under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/1031 after internal grievances and appeals were dismissed. The Employment Tribunal allowed Mr Homer’s claim. In the EAT, Elias P,〔() IRLR 262〕 overturning the Tribunal, held that there was no basis for thinking there was any particular disadvantage for those aged between 60 and 65, because it was not intrinsically more difficult for people in that category to get a degree. The financial consequences resulted merely from age, not age discrimination. The Court of Appeal agreed with the EAT, arguing that it was not Mr Homer’s age that put him at a particular disadvantage but his impending retirement, the same as any employee nearing retirement in four years. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.